As organizations across the U.S. adapt to an array of new and evolving state privacy laws, the importance of understanding—and complying with—local requirements is more critical than ever. In this ninth installment of our ongoing series on data protection and privacy legislation, we turn our attention to the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act (DPDPA), shedding light on its key provisions, practical implications, and compliance considerations. We’ll also highlight the vital importance of secure data deletion, introducing solutions like Active@ KillDisk and KillDisk Industrial as effective tools for meeting regulatory requirements and building customer trust.
Delaware, often heralded as a corporate-friendly state, formally adopted the DPDPA with the passage of House Bill 154, sponsored by Representative Krista Griffith. The bill was approved by the state legislators on June 30, 2023, and signed into law on September 11, 2023. It has gone into full effect on January 1, 2025. The law provides modern and meaningful privacy protections for its residents, reflecting the increasingly data-driven nature of commercial activity and aiming to give Delawareans stronger control over their personal information while balancing the needs of businesses.
The DPDPA applies to businesses that conduct activities in Delaware or target products and services to Delaware residents, provided they meet thresholds based on data volume or revenue sourced from data activities. While inspired by broader laws such as California’s CPRA and Virginia’s VCDPA, Delaware’s law takes a more moderate approach, focusing narrowly on core data rights and sensitive data handling.
The DPDPA applies to any company that either operates in the state or sells products and services to people who live there. A business falls under this new law if, in the last calendar year, it met one of these two conditions:
These numbers may seem high, but the 35,000-person limit is actually the lowest threshold of any data privacy law so far in the U.S. On top of that, the revenue requirement — only 20% — is relatively easy to meet for businesses involved in selling data. Because of these lower thresholds, the DPDPA is likely to apply to many more small and medium-sized companies than previous privacy laws, meaning that businesses that may not have been affected before will now have to follow new rules for how they collect, store, and sell personal information.
Delaware places particular emphasis on “sensitive data”— a category encompassing information such as racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, health conditions, sexual orientation, precise geolocation, and biometric identifiers. Businesses are required to obtain explicit, opt-in consent before collecting or processing such sensitive personal data. This step elevates the level of consumer protection and requires organizations to re-evaluate their consent management systems and data collection practices.
While Delaware offers more moderate consumer data rights compared to some other states, individuals are still empowered in several important ways. Core rights under the DPDPA include:
Similar to other state privacy laws, the DPDPA requires businesses to respond to consumer requests within 45 days, with the option to extend that deadline by another 45 days in certain cases. The scope and procedural details of these rights are somewhat narrower than in California or Colorado, providing a moderate compliance burden for organizations.
Clear communication is vital. The DPDPA mandates that companies provide comprehensive privacy notices, informing consumers about:
The Act requires businesses to maintain “reasonable” security measures appropriate to the nature of the collected data and its risk profile. Additionally, organizations working with processors or vendors must ensure contractual obligations are in place that enforce data security, confidentiality, and prompt compliance with consumer data requests.
Delaware’s Attorney General is responsible for enforcing DPDPA. Civil penalties are available for non-compliance, but the focus is on remediation—businesses are frequently given the opportunity to cure violations before penalties are imposed. This gives organizations a chance to address issues swiftly but does not diminish the importance of strong internal controls. There is no private right of action for consumers, which reduces the immediate litigation risk compared to some other states.
Some organizations and types of data are not covered by the DPDPA.
Who’s exempt:
What data is exempt:
Delaware’s law strikes a moderate balance. Its provisions are comprehensive enough to ensure meaningful consumer protections, particularly regarding sensitive data, but the overall restrictiveness for businesses is less than in some pioneering states like California. For example, the limited array of consumer rights, the centralization of enforcement, and the existence of remedial cure periods collectively reduce the compliance pressure, even as data minimization and robust security remain paramount.
A recurring theme throughout the DPDPA—and similar state laws—is the consumer’s right to be deleted. For businesses, this translates into a technical imperative: how do you ensure that deleted data is, in fact, unrecoverable?
Simply marking files for deletion or reformatting drives is not enough; modern forensic techniques can recover such information, posing a threat to both compliance and security. True compliance demands data sanitization—secure, verifiable, and irreversible deletion of personal information from all systems and devices.
To reliably meet the DPDPA’s data deletion requirements, consider advanced tools such as Active@ KillDisk and KillDisk Industrial. These solutions are designed to:
By integrating KillDisk products into your data management workflow, you increase your organization’s protection against regulatory penalties and demonstrate a serious commitment to consumer privacy.
The Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act reflects a growing acknowledgement that privacy is a core component of consumer protection, even in states with a business-friendly reputation. While its requirements may be “moderate” compared to the nation’s most restrictive laws, organizations should not underestimate their significance. Compliance can serve as a foundation for a robust, adaptable privacy program—especially as more states and countries move ahead with similar legislation.
Organizations should see compliance not as a burden, but as an investment—laying the groundwork for scalable privacy programs as more jurisdictions adopt similar frameworks. Proactive adoption of secure deletion tools like KillDisk ensures both compliance and trust in an ever-evolving privacy environment.
References: